All comparisons

Every job board is a copy of somewhere else, arriving later.

This one isn't about any particular product. Aggregators exist to pull jobs from many places into one searchable index, which is a useful thing to be. It also puts two unavoidable delays between a job existing and you knowing about it.

A board indexes a job, then notifies you. We drop the first step, and the second stops being a schedule.

Side by side

Each row is how that tool is built to work, taken from what it says about itself. None of this is a benchmark we ran.

 job boardsTrakker
SourceAn index built from crawls and syndication feedsThe employer's live hiring system
Delay before you can be toldCrawl interval, plus indexing, plus the alert scheduleOne pass, usually minutes
Duplicates and dead listingsCommon, because sources disagree and expiry is guessed atOne row per job, keyed on the employer's own job id
Who it's forEveryone, so the filters are genericStudents and new grads, so level is a first-class filter

What job boards are better at

Breadth and browsing. If you don't yet know what you want or which companies you'd work for, a big searchable index beats a targeted alert feed, and there's no substitute for it at that stage.

When not to switch

Job boards make the most sense early in a search, when you're still deciding what to apply for. Speed only becomes the thing that matters once you know which jobs you want.

The detail

The dead posting problem
An aggregator usually can't see a job close. It can only see that the job stopped showing up in a feed, which is why boards carry roles that were filled a fortnight ago. Reading the source means a job's existence and its disappearance come from the same place.

Stop finding out on Friday.

Setup takes about two minutes. After that, the jobs come to you.

You won’t need a card. Used by hundreds of students.